The South Carolina Supreme Court certified the following question from the United States District Court: “Can a legal malpractice claim be assigned between adversaries in litigation in which the alleged legal malpractice arose?” The Court answered the question in the negative, following the majority of other jurisdictions that have addressed the issue and finding that such an assignment is void as against public policy. Specifically, the Court recognized, as other jurisdictions have noted, that permitting the assignment of a legal malpractice claim among adversaries in litigation in which the alleged malpractice arose would incentivize collusion. “A party should not be permitted to transmute a claim against a penniless adversary into a claim against the adversary’s wealthier lawyer based on the lawyer’s supposed negligence towards the adversary.” The Court also noted that such an assignment “threatens the integrity of the attorney-client relationship” and “would lead to disreputable role reversals in which the plaintiff-assignee would be required to take a position ‘diametrically opposed’ to its position in the underlying litigation.”
Skipper v. ACE Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., Op. No. 27547 (S.C. July 15, 2015).
Read the full opinion here.
- Haigler named to prestigious Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
- Beard and Till Poteat co-author latest edition of authoritative book on workers’ compensation
- Lisle Traywick joins the board of the South Carolina Chapter of the Federal Bar Association
- Beth Richardson sworn in as president of the South Carolina Chapter of the Federal Bar Association
- Check out our workers’ compensation calculators
- Attorney Chris Boguski joins Robinson Gray as associate
- Ashley Johnson and Ben Gooding named among ‘Best & Brightest’ for 2019
- Lisle Traywick named to 2020 Leadership Columbia class