The South Carolina Supreme Court certified the following question from the United States District Court: “Can a legal malpractice claim be assigned between adversaries in litigation in which the alleged legal malpractice arose?” The Court answered the question in the negative, following the majority of other jurisdictions that have addressed the issue and finding that such an assignment is void as against public policy. Specifically, the Court recognized, as other jurisdictions have noted, that permitting the assignment of a legal malpractice claim among adversaries in litigation in which the alleged malpractice arose would incentivize collusion. “A party should not be permitted to transmute a claim against a penniless adversary into a claim against the adversary’s wealthier lawyer based on the lawyer’s supposed negligence towards the adversary.” The Court also noted that such an assignment “threatens the integrity of the attorney-client relationship” and “would lead to disreputable role reversals in which the plaintiff-assignee would be required to take a position ‘diametrically opposed’ to its position in the underlying litigation.”
Skipper v. ACE Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., Op. No. 27547 (S.C. July 15, 2015).
Read the full opinion here.
- Robinson Gray Member Beth Richardson recognized as a 2019 Woman of Influence
- New measure sets flat, predictable fees in Register of Deeds offices in SC
- Robinson Gray again named as ‘Band 1’ firm in general commercial litigation by Chambers USA
- Veteran tax attorney Timothy Thompson joins Robinson Gray law firm
- Beth Richardson joins Spring 2019 Class of Diversity Leaders Initiative
- Celeste Bowers joins board of Palmetto Land Title Association
- Seven Robinson Gray attorneys named Super Lawyers; five named Rising Stars
- Ashley Johnson joins Columbia’s Design Development and Review Commission