By Will Jordan
During the course of litigation pending in federal district court in Florida, Client sought and obtained advice from Lawyer about Client’s contractual exposure to the opposing party’s attorney’s fees under Florida law. Lawyer advised Client that Client did not face a significant risk of exposure to attorney’s fees. Ultimately, the U.S Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ordered Client to pay more than $1,000,000 in attorney’s fees to the opposing party. Client sued Lawyer for legal malpractice. The Florida appellate court affirmed summary judgment in favor of Lawyer, finding that Lawyer’s advice “was in accord with the weight of Florida law” and “therefore breached no standard of care and cannot amount to malpractice as a matter of law.”
Air Turbine Tech., Inc. v. Quarles & Brady, LLC, No. 4D14-110 (Fl. Ct. App., June 3, 2015).
Read the full opinion here.
- Robinson Gray’s Beth Burke Richardson named to receive Diversity & Inclusion Award
- Robinson Gray named to top tier in 2020 Best Law Firms in America
- Haigler named to prestigious Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
- Beard and Till Poteat co-author latest edition of authoritative book on workers’ compensation
- Lisle Traywick joins the board of the South Carolina Chapter of the Federal Bar Association
- Beth Richardson sworn in as president of the South Carolina Chapter of the Federal Bar Association
- Check out our workers’ compensation calculators
- Attorney Chris Boguski joins Robinson Gray as associate